Welcome to MediaReset.com

You’ve arrived at a blog about transforming the companies that publish newspapers. And it’s a blog with an unorthodox point of view.

Here it is: News will not save you.

Why not? Because the disruption that’s pounding newspaper companies is not about people Read the rest of this entry

Media business model: Are you running the Scotch Tape store?

If you’re old enough to remember Saturday Night Live in its glory days, maybe you remember the hilarious sketches set in the Scotch Tape store at the old mall.

The bit was centered on, and got its laughs from, a ridiculously narrow business model centered on a single product, sold in a retail location that was no longer the cool place to be. (I’d love to link to a clip here, but I couldn’t find one. NBC must be closely guarding its copyright.)

Those sketches came to mind this week as I was trying to think of a metaphor for the newspaper business and its relentless concentration on news. News continues to be our industry’s central purpose and the heart of its business model for attracting audiences.

I laughed out loud when it occurred to me that we might be well on the way to becoming the Scotch Tape store, or “Scotch Boutique,” as they called it. But the idea is as painful as it is funny.

Before I go any further, I need to say this: News is a high calling, and I am by no means suggesting we abandon it or cheapen it. Doing the news continues to be a critical function in a free society, and news well done continues to be a powerful attractor of audiences.

The problem is, it’s not enough anymore.

The digital revolution has forever changed the world around us. The range and number of “products” competing with news for the attention of our audiences has exploded beyond measure and beyond imagination. News, like Scotch Tape, is still a great product, but it’s less and less adequate as the sole basis of a media business model.

To develop the metaphor: Over at the new mall, where it’s cool to go, are things like Google, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, Snapchat, and even old-timers like Craigslist, Autotrader, Yahoo and AOL.

In the old mall, there are lots of once powerful businesses like newspapers, books and magazines, struggling to attract consumer traffic and sales.

To correct the metaphor, the old mall and the new mall are not really specific and separate places on the Web. Instagram is only a click or two away from any newspaper or magazine website. But our audience metrics at Morris reveal that people in our markets visit “shops” like Google and Facebook 10 to 20 times as often as they visit our news shops. In that sense, we are the old mall, they are the new mall.

A lot of people in our industry seem to think that if they can only get the news storytelling right, or the presentation or the subject choices, we’ll win traffic back to our shops.

Certainly we can gain ground that way. But we’ll never catch up with the new giants by peddling news alone. (Okay, we also offer events calendars, obituaries, classified advertising and other tangential content that’s not exactly news. But really, our sites are all about news, and that’s why most of our visitors go there.)

Here’s my point: We have to stop trying to sell only the product we like to make and start thinking how to produce “new-mall” products our audiences will eagerly consume. And this can fit our core purpose just as well as news does — but more on that in a moment.

Rethinking our product set is critical, because our audiences live in a totally different world from the one in which news became the dominant form of content. They now live in a world where they can get any type of content they want in seconds, from infinitely abundant supplies. (Except, apparently, videos of old SNL sketches.)

Think about people this way: Every individual is a consciousness surrounded in 360 degrees by the subjects, issues, concerns and activities that make up his or her life.

360

Life surrounds us in 360 degrees with subjects, issues, situations, opportunities and problems. For most people, news occupies only a few degrees of that large circle.

Back in the days of the “old mall” — the traditional media — people could only get limited amounts of information because it was so difficult and costly to prepare and distribute content. Only experts like publishers and broadcasters had the means to do it, and the quantities they could produce in a day or a year were very, very small.

So, as an individual consumer, you could get only a little bit of content on subjects you cared about by going to newspapers, magazines, books, radio and television. Most of your life consisted of subjects the media rarely touched. You were on your own to figure those out.

The “new mall,” however, is all about those issues. On the Web, you can find content directly relating to every big and little interest and concern in your life. You can get content that’s immediately useful in what you’re doing or about to do. Content that’s suited to exactly who you are, to what your life situation is, to what you care about, to what makes you laugh, to what you are considering doing right now. And, with a smartphone in your hand, you can get all of this in seconds, anywhere you are.

Most of the “stores” in the new mall were created by figuring out something that touched a place on the circle that wasn’t being well served. They figured out a need or desire that wasn’t being fulfilled, an occasion in a user’s life when they needed or would like a solution and none existed. So they created a way to fulfill it.

No wonder people’s media attention time is now being spread to so many places other than news. They will self-administer huge amounts of content that relates to their lives, while news, at best, will win a few minutes of their attention per day.

I’ll quote from “Part III: What about news?” — one of the three initial posts that started this blog:

The good news is, even in the Infinite Media Era, people still live in communities. They still get up every morning with things they need to do in the local space, places they need to go, things they need to buy or sell,  interests they want to satisfy, problems they need to solve. So they still need local information — far more, in fact, than they need news, which now seems to be everywhere. They want the kinds of personally relevant local information that will help them get things done in their lives.

So it’s time for a fundamental awakening in local media businesses. We need to stop thinking [only] of our communities as places where news happens and we report it. We need to start thinking of our communities as places where people lead their lives and we help them do it. We need to figure how to provide solutions they will regard as essential in their own lives and will use over and over every day. News has its place in this, but it’s a far bigger assignment than news.

The same is true for magazine companies. They don’t usually deal with a geographic place — they deal with a specific interest. Their audiences share that interest, and the circle of their lives may include broad swaths of activities, decisions and concerns related to that interest. How can a magazine company supply the content and enable its audiences to go forward in those areas?

For newspapers, an earlier post provides a lot of ideas about what types of content might work. For magazines, an earlier post provides examples of how to figure out the new opportunity spaces.

Nobody is forcing us to keep trying to build a business around selling Scotch Tape in the old mall. Opportunities are available all around use to help people lead their lives in new ways. It’s our job to figure them out.

Native advertising — what is it, and why now

“I want my ad to go right here,” Jerry Coolman said. He pointed at the middle two columns at the top of the newspaper page — right in the middle of an article. He wanted his ad for lawn tractors to hit readers smack between the eyes.

“Jerry, we can’t do that,” I said. “That’s the reader’s space — we can’t plunk an ad down in the middle of it.”

That was 1983. Now, twenty years later, it turns out we can plunk an ad down in the reader’s space. It’s being done more and more, and it’s being called by a new name: “native advertising.” Read the rest of this entry

How Morris is reversing the biggest disruption: Loss of advertising accounts

About five years ago, on a weekend, Derek May — then publisher of the St. Augustine (FL) Record — was doing what many publishers were doing at the time: Trying to figure out the steep decline in advertising revenue he was seeing in his unit’s financials.

What was the main cause of the decline? The recession was the driver, of course, but was it mainly hitting certain categories of advertising? Certain types of advertisers? Big advertisers? Small advertisers? Read the rest of this entry

To win in mobile: It’s a situation, not a news channel

To someone who only has a hammer, everything looks like a nail. In the newspaper industry, the hammer we have is news. And right now, the new nail is mobile.

With mobile usage exploding, our industry is determined to pound that nail with news as hard and fast as we can. It looks like a must-do, a matter of survival, and — we hope — a new opportunity to reach people, sell advertising and make money. But mobile is not the nail we think it is. Read the rest of this entry

Recruitment can be a land of opportunity

Say the word “recruitment” and most newspaper executives groan. Over the last seven or eight years, our revenue in this space has shrunk to a fraction of its former size, and it’s still slipping.

At Morris Publishing Group, we’ve been looking hard at this vertical for several months. We’ve been trying to figure out two things: How can we do better at what’s left of our existing business, and how can we create new wins in this space?

We’re beginning to see path ahead, so it’s a good time to share some of what we’ve learned. Read the rest of this entry

Media disruption: Bad for us, wonderful for humanity

Disruption of the mass media is a big subject. But here’s an even bigger one: The incredible amount of good this same disruption is bringing to humanity worldwide.

So let’s forget about the mass media for a few minutes. Let’s take a look at the massive and mostly positive impact this digital revolution is having and will continue to have on humanity. Read the rest of this entry

Why the definition of news must change in the digital age

Nothing is more deeply ingrained in the newspaper industry than the definition of news. It’s the foundation of what we do, the “product” we use to attract and serve consumer audiences, and the platform on which we sell most of our advertising.

Now the definition desperately needs fundamental change, as I’ll document below. If we hope to be relevant and engaging to the people in our markets, we need to start over, beginning with a fresh answer to the question, “What is news?” Read the rest of this entry

Four huge takeaways from Borrell’s “The Future of Legacy Media”

When your industry is undergoing massive disruption, getting a glimpse of the future is priceless. The more you know about where things are going, the smarter you can be about what to do right now.

For that reason, the report released earlier this month by Borrell Associates — “The Future of Legacy Media” — should be required reading for everyone responsible for the health and sustainability of any legacy media business in the United States and Canada. Read the rest of this entry

The big picture: Mass media era was the blink of an eye

Image converted using ifftoany

In the midst of major change, we can only make the right moves if we properly understand what’s happening.

Right now, we in the mass media are wrestling with the most massive change we’ve ever seen. But, as in the parable of the blind men and the elephant, we’re only aware of the tiny part of this change that we touch every day. Read the rest of this entry

‘It’s the end of advertising as we’ve known it’

I was surprised to hear those words come out of my mouth recently, during a strategic discussion about where our company, Morris Communications, needs to be in three to five years.

I heard myself say, “We need to realize that we’re witnessing the end of advertising as we’ve known it. Not this year, not next year, but over a period of not very many years.” Read the rest of this entry

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 211 other followers